Lawyer Vesna Čejović, representing a group of citizens and activists from Bar, has repeatedly raised concerns about the planned construction of an LNG terminal and gas-fired power plant in Bar port, located just a few hundred meters from residential buildings, schools, and public spaces. She highlighted the risks associated with such facilities, classified under European directives as first-category explosion hazards, especially in seismically active areas like Bar.
The project has faced consistent opposition from local authorities, including the Mayor of Bar, Dušan Raičević, and numerous environmental organizations, who argue that it contradicts the Spatial Plan of Montenegro until 2040 and poses significant safety, economic, and environmental risks. Despite this, successive governments, including the current administration led by Milojko Spajić, have signed memorandums with foreign companies, including the Japanese energy firm JERA, without public consultations or local government consent.
LNG terminals, which receive, store, and transfer liquefied natural gas, are highly flammable and operate under extreme pressure, making them particularly dangerous if accidents or natural disasters occur. Globally, most LNG terminals are located far from populated areas to minimize risk, but the Bar project would be unusually close to residential zones.
International experience shows that LNG terminals often operate below capacity due to technical and social challenges. In Italy, Greece, and Croatia, several terminals are underutilized, frequently facing public opposition. Critics argue that the Bar terminal could similarly face operational, safety, and economic issues, while negatively impacting tourism and local property values.
The project has been promoted as a strategic energy initiative to reduce dependence on Russian gas, yet its economic and environmental benefits remain uncertain.
